Can God Make a Soul So Evil That Even God Cannot Love It?

I know that I am not alone in thinking that particularism is flawed. Eschatological Particularism, the idea that God can not or will not “save” every one and every thing, relies on a belief in a God who is either not omnipotent or is not benevolent. One of these must be lacking, or else God would spend all of eternity trying to reach every last soul, even if we accept that every person must submit to playing by some arbitrary rules set that God has imposed on itself to make creation into a game.

The only argument I have ever heard against Universalism, given the assumption of a loving creator, is that we have “freewill” to choose to be saved or not. That’s fine, as far as it goes, but it negates the idea of freewill in that we had to be created first. If Damnation is the default, and we have to choose not to be damned, then the act of Creation is the act of damning, and thus there is no inherent choice in whether or not to play the game, only whether or not to submit to the rules imposed. That,  I have to point out, is not freewill.

So, I ask you, if there is a creator who can do all things, but chooses not to love us all, then how is that being worthy of reverence? How loving or powerful is a God who spends eternity fuming that we did something bad, especially if we believe that simply thinking something is a sin, and condemns souls forever? Not just to boredom or even discomfort, but to misery! That is not a God I can love. No temporal sin warrants eternal punishment.

That is why I reject the ideas of eternal damnation and original sin. My vision of God is a being of love, encouraging us to do better and treat each other with kindness; in short, to love each other as God loves us. Any less is a being unworthy of my worship or devotion.


5 Responses

  1. […] Can God Make a Soul So Evil That Even God Cannot Love It? […]

    • I am not a unitarian universalist. I believe in original sin. Yet it doesn’t make sense to me either how God can create a person only to damn him/her forever. It seems to me like Jesus died to pay for everyone’s sins, so why is it we go around judging and damning one another?

      • If God’s plan was for Jesus to save everyone, then how could it fail? If it can’t fail, then I welcome you to Universalism. If it can, then I question your definition of God. Once you stop judging people and start loving them, even when you try to help them be better, you get to call yourself a UU if you want. You may prefer a more specific label (See my post on why I don’t actually call myself a Unitarian Universalist), but you are part of the movement to make this world a better place for every living thing.

  2. I have at times bordered on Universalism. What I tend to go back to is just trusting Jesus. I am certain of his good will for everyone he has created, and he is our judge.

  3. […] previously argued that our creator must love us all, and must either have one final destination planned for all of us, or be a being unworthy of my […]

Speak your piece

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: